General Information of Disease (ID: DISJ4P9O)

Disease Name Central diabetes insipidus
Synonyms diabetes insipidus neurogenic; diabetes insipidus cranial type; diabetes insipidus neurohypophyseal; neurogenic diabetes insipidus; CDI
Definition
Central diabetes insipidus (CDI) is a hypothalamus-pituitary disease characterized by polyuria and polydipsia due to a vasopressin (AVP) deficiency. It can be inherited or acquired (hereditary CDI and acquired CDI).
Disease Hierarchy
DISRXDI4: Neuroendocrine disorder
:
DISJ4P9O: Central diabetes insipidus
Disease Identifiers
MONDO ID
MONDO_0015790
MESH ID
D020790
UMLS CUI
C0687720
OMIM ID
125700
MedGen ID
146919
HPO ID
HP:0000863
Orphanet ID
178029
SNOMED CT ID
45369008

Molecular Interaction Atlas (MIA) of This Disease

Molecular Interaction Atlas (MIA)
This Disease Is Related to 9 DTT Molecule(s)
Gene Name DTT ID Evidence Level Mode of Inheritance REF
RPH3A TT9L4J8 Limited Biomarker [1]
ASPH TT2KHP7 moderate Biomarker [2]
ASPA TT6TLZP Strong Biomarker [3]
ATP4A TTF1QVM Strong Genetic Variation [4]
AVPR2 TTK8R02 Strong Biomarker [5]
GPR182 TTT23CG Strong Biomarker [6]
NPTX2 TTNJ5A6 Definitive Genetic Variation [7]
NRP2 TTRXUVC Definitive Genetic Variation [7]
SLC9A3 TTFZVPO Definitive Biomarker [8]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
⏷ Show the Full List of 9 DTT(s)
This Disease Is Related to 2 DTP Molecule(s)
Gene Name DTP ID Evidence Level Mode of Inheritance REF
ATP12A DT5NLZA Strong Genetic Variation [4]
SLC26A3 DTN1FMD Strong Altered Expression [8]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Disease Is Related to 1 DME Molecule(s)
Gene Name DME ID Evidence Level Mode of Inheritance REF
UGDH DE48Q2Z Definitive Biomarker [9]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Disease Is Related to 19 DOT Molecule(s)
Gene Name DOT ID Evidence Level Mode of Inheritance REF
ACAD8 OT3JI5GB Limited Biomarker [10]
AQP2 OTQLBKK6 Limited Biomarker [5]
TFAP2B OTR1T8E9 Limited Genetic Variation [11]
CLVS1 OTQH008A moderate Genetic Variation [2]
MTFMT OT1OIVJL moderate Biomarker [12]
A1CF OTJBKFA1 Strong Biomarker [3]
BTBD8 OT3A3RD7 Strong Biomarker [13]
GZMM OTEC5CWT Strong Biomarker [14]
HCFC1 OT0UCK62 Strong Biomarker [15]
MAX OTKZ0YKM Strong Biomarker [16]
ROPN1L OTRWZJ68 Strong Biomarker [3]
RPS20 OTI8052R Strong Genetic Variation [17]
RTCA OTSJRVTD Strong Biomarker [18]
SEL1L OTC0FB7T Strong Biomarker [19]
SUMF2 OT37I8JL Strong Genetic Variation [20]
SYNM OTOI8TRJ Strong Biomarker [21]
CRYL1 OT0SJSJM Definitive Biomarker [9]
GLUD1 OTXKOCUH Definitive Biomarker [9]
H6PD OTO7TNDD Definitive Biomarker [9]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
⏷ Show the Full List of 19 DOT(s)

References

1 Cullin-associated NEDD8-dissociated protein 1, a novel interactor of rabphilin-3A, deubiquitylates rabphilin-3A and regulates arginine vasopressin secretion in PC12 cells.Endocr J. 2018 Mar 28;65(3):325-334. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0399. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2 Host genetic susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infections in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: a genome-wide association study.Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3127-3134. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4173-6. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
3 Diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile testing: a quasi-experimental antimicrobial stewardship study.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):269-275. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.336. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4 Identification of target risk groups for population-based Clostridium difficile infection prevention strategies using a population attributable risk approach.Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;66:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.11.021. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5 Diabetes Insipidus.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;969:213-225. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-1057-0_14.
6 How to Save Half a Million Dollars: An Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Care Center.Cureus. 2019 Jul 10;11(7):e5121. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5121.
7 A novel splice site mutation of the arginine vasopressin-neurophysin II gene identified in a kindred with autosomal dominant familial neurohypophyseal diabetes insipidus.Mol Genet Metab. 2005 Sep-Oct;86(1-2):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2005.05.009. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
8 Clostridium difficile toxins A and B decrease intestinal SLC26A3 protein expression.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018 Jul 1;315(1):G43-G52. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00307.2017. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
9 A two-step approach improves the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Dec;143:17-19. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10 Effect of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.J Crohns Colitis. 2018 May 25;12(6):710-717. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy031.
11 A novel missense mutation in TFAP2B associated with Char syndrome and central diabetes insipidus.Am J Med Genet A. 2019 Jul;179(7):1299-1303. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61150. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
12 Fecal microbiota transplantation in a toddler after heart transplant was a safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection: A case report.Pediatr Transplant. 2020 Feb;24(1):e13598. doi: 10.1111/petr.13598. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
13 Risk factors and treatment outcomes of severe Clostridioides difficile infection in Singapore.Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 17;9(1):13440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49794-7.
14 Effects of defined gut microbial ecosystem components on virulence determinants of Clostridioides difficile.Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37547-x.
15 Effect of Clostridium difficile Prevalence in Hospitals and Nursing Homes on Risk of Infection.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1527-1534. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14838. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
16 Evaluation of a nucleic acid amplification assay for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection.Anaerobe. 2019 Oct;59:201-204. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
17 Burden of Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile infection during inpatient stays in the USA between 2012 and 2016.J Hosp Infect. 2019 Jun;102(2):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
18 Monitoring in real time the cytotoxic effect of Clostridium difficile upon the intestinal epithelial cell line HT29.J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Dec;119:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
19 Mice deficient for ERAD machinery component Sel1L develop central diabetes insipidus.J Clin Invest. 2017 Oct 2;127(10):3591-3593. doi: 10.1172/JCI96839. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
20 Typing and susceptibility of bacterial isolates from the fidaxomicin (OPT-80) phase II study for C. difficile infection.Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):234-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
21 Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates collected during a phase 2b clinical study with SYN-004 (ribaxamase) for the prevention of C.difficile infection.Anaerobe. 2018 Oct;53:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 5.